October 2009 Archives

Amma Kali or Are You My Monster?

user-pic

The other night my friend Fred announced he didn't believe in God, that religion and spirituality were just an opiate imposed on the suffering masses. Clearly Fred had never seen Godspell. That said, even though it rankles me when people make such sweeping pronouncements, I decided not to argue in favor of the Divine. Instead, I simply asked, "How's that goin' for ya?" And Fred shrugged and replied, "Not so good."

The following day, a dreary one, I was pondering what it means and doesn't mean to be bound to a set of pre-ordained structures that define the way we eat, drink, pray, have sex and wear clothes. Was horror progenitor H.P. Lovecraft correct in his assertion that the universe is fundamentally monstrous or did I just need a yoga class and a sundae? Is the monster inside or out? And whatever happened to metaphor?

I took these and other questions to Adi Shakti, AKA Kali: the demonic yet benevolent mother goddess, the incarnation of Maya and the destroyer of egos. Talk about on the rag: homegirl is covered in blood and wears a necklace of oozing, bloody skulls. 108 to be exact. And they're all kvetching non-stop about everything under the moon. Moreover, she's got four arms one of which is holding a sword and the other your severed head/ego. Meantime, she's flashing the abhaya--fearlessness-- and varada--blessings--mudra while she's stomping on Lord Shiva's chest; and she breastfed and possibly birthed the guy. Just another family dinner, I guess. Or rather, the mind is a terrible thing to taste.

"What kind of mother are you?" I asked. "What's did I do to deserve this?" Only I couldn't quite catch Kali's response over the chatter of the 108 blathering heads, which were either my maya--illusion--or my own ego--dissolution--raveling and unraveling my self with every crushing step. For this I went to Hebrew school?

Unnerved, I pondered further. Surely our beliefs, whatever our opinion of the Great Equalizer and his/her existence, are a manifestation of our ego and Kali has to stomp those suckers too. That's just part of her dance. But here's the deal: revolution's a bloodbath. Could it be that Kali is time itself--kala--simultaneously dancing, procreating and wreaking havoc in my blessed wrecking ball of a head just before she rips it off and wears it as an earring? Though a scenario we may justly seek to avoid, in the Cosmic Reality Kali's actions are merely monstrous in the word's most literal form: from the Latin monstrare- to show, reveal. As in, show me the monster.

"Oh my Goddess," I thought. "Fred's right. And wrong. I have to call my mother."

harihara.jpgIt's difficult to date a super hero. They're busy, unreliable, moody. Most make promises they can't keep. But that's the hegemony of promises: AKA well-intentioned resolutions reliant on the notion of life in a permanent external honeymoon state rather than a journey towards internal, self-sufficient bliss. Think of Superman and Lois Lane, Aeneas and Dido, Ram and Sita. Now, as adults, we all know the honeymoon stage is just that: a stage, even if we're blindly standing smack-dab in the middle of it. And yet, save deep suffering, we cling to the idea of perfection and permanence in all external states of being, especially where relationships are concerned. Meantime, we're so busy polishing the pedestal of what was and what could or should be that we not only don't notice the man behind the maya--illusion-- we also strive to maintain the maya like there's no manana. 

Take Ram and Sita. Star-crossed lovers whose tempestuous honeymoon is the divine equivalent of Groucho Marx's Hello, I Must be Going. Sita loves Ram so much she follows him into exile only to be kidnapped soon after by his rival. As if that weren't enough, after Hanuman rescues her from Lanka, Ram's peeps cast aspersions on Sita's fidelity. After all that time in captivity how could sexy Sita not have canoodled with the dashingly villainous king? In order to test her purity, the people of Ayodhya make Sita walk through fire. Which she does. Willingly. In fact, sister jumps right in. Luckily, she manages to escape unscathed. That said, you can't go home again. Even after a visit to the proverbial burn unit. Or rather, you can but somebody moved all the furniture around and changed the wall paper and you liked it better the old way. IE the honeymoon stage. Prithee go back, you cry nostalgically. Remember the time? Remember? 

Next thing you know, the good people of Ayodhya starting trash-talking Ram. "If it were my wife, I wouldn't take that Sita back," they say. "Not after all that time with another man who's been dishing out the jewelry like there's no Ramayana." So what's the seventh incarnation of Vishnu to do? He's made a promise to his public. In other words, it doesn't matter what quality sirloin Lois Lane's got frying in her pan, when Superman's gotta go, he's gotta go. Only this time, it's Sita who's gotta go. Into exile. And she's pregnant. With Ram's twins. Don't worry, Valmiki saves her and she raises her kiddies in his hermitage where they sing songs of praise to Ram all day. One afternoon, Ram happens by the forest and hears the chanting. At last Sita is both expiated and manumitted. So what happens? Mother Earth swallows her up. As she is interred, Ram realizes his mistakes. Thus the relationship actually evolves. End of honeymoon. Or shall I say beginning? Middle? Life is in a permanent state of transition with nostalgia as its bellows and clinging as its camouflage. Meanwhile, somewhere between the first kiss and the funeral is the rising and dying fire. It may be a slower burn than you thought you wanted, but you can walk through it. In fact, not only are you walking through it right now, you are it. For the love of Ram.

Shiva vs. Vishnu

user-pic
harihara.jpgAmong the Trimurti-- Brahma (the Creator), Vishnu (the Sustainer), Shiva (the Destroyer)--the past, present or future sufferer is often drawn to Shiva rather than Vishnu or Brahma This makes sense. Shiva's got the danse macabre, the five heads, the elephant man for a kid. It's demonic yet human. Also, every culture starts with the idea of death and dissolution. Indeed the root impulse of all culture is to band together to create rituals that attempt to stave off death. And I don't just mean exercise and under-eye cream. Just as the mind needs its obstacles or it's just jelly in a jar, civilization needs the monster behind the wall and civilization is that very wall. AKA it's what you do all day long. As Zorba the Greek once said, "Life is how the time goes by." 

Interestingly, it is in sustaining our day-to-day selves that we perceive the idea of a plateau or, worse yet, an impasse in the practice of our amazing lives. Then we get aggravated. I mean, how many years will it take me to go from crow to headstand? It feels like Shiva himself is lowering the floor away from me when actually Vishnu is challenging me to garner my true self and turn what seems like a death-defying drop to a manageable plop. And what's the worse thing that can happen? I fall on my head? It's only five inches from the ground. Besides, it is in the course of the impasse, the course of readying ourselves, that we deepen who we really are. It's seems terrifying, but it may just be riding the wave. Think of it as soul surfing. 

Only here's the radical part: What we perceive as nothing is really everything which is no thing at all. Trippy, but the Gita describes Vishnu as being beyond human perception. Not bad for a guy with four arms. Not to mention two of his ten avatars are Ram and Krishna. Though even they seem to get more airtime. But that's the thing with Vishnu: even though he's the middleman in the Trimurti, indeed the gig with the least accolade, his consort is Lakshmi (Abundance). Not only is Lakshmi quite attractive in her own right-- the Hindu Venus on the Half-shell-- but she is also the personification of Maya (Illusion). Thus Vishnu (the Sustainer) needs Illusion in order to propagate and keep on keepin' on. It's all in the in impasse, baby. Only what if the impasse is actually a crossroads? What then? How will the time go by? Or rather as Yogi Berra once said, "When you come to a fork in the road, take it."

Ganesh

user-pic
ganesh.jpgA life without obstacles is akin to a sock without a foot: practical but limp. Just ask Ganesh. The son of Shiva and Parvati, baby Ganapati was beheaded by his own father just for hanging out in the doorway while his mommy took a bath, thus blocking Shiva's entrance to his own home. Clearly, Shiva's reflexive and some might say overbearing response was highly upsetting to Parvati. After all, it had been a difficult labor; Parvati had created her beloved progeny from her own oils, sweat and tears. Subsequently, there was a lot of turbulence in the home. What could Lord Shiva do but replace Ganapati's head with that of an elephant? End of domestic dispute. Beginning of Lord Ganesh, remover and creator of obstacles, lord of intelligence and rider of the musica--the mouse/rat, AKA the subjugated demon of the ego. You gotta admit: the guy triumphed under seemingly impossible odds.

Meantime, when we non-elephant heads perceive obstacles in our path, we feel emotions that run the gamut from aggravation to outrage. We may even begin to compare and despair: why is my path so blocked while Esther's seems so free? She sallies forth with nary a concern, "getting" everything she wants so easily: a gigantic brownstone, a loving spouse, healthy children. The other night, having dinner with Esther and feeling blocked and somewhat jealous, I kept thinking of Gore Vidal's famous quote, "With every success of one of my friends, a small part of me dies." Remove my blocks, Ganesha, I later prayed. Make my path smooth and simple--an easy passage. For god's sake, haven't I suffered enough?

Days later, Esther called me to complain about a situation with her husband. She was doing all the work in their household and thus she felt caught in a trap of her own making. "I wish my life were more like yours," she admitted. "A life where anything can happen." That afternoon, it hit me that we often mistake possibility for obstacles, rather than vice versa. After all, most obstacles exist in our own minds. They are maya--illusion--rather than some dire fate or unjust external reality. "You see?" we cry triumphantly. "You see how blocked I am?" If only we could understand the obstacles as a challenge and thus supplant suffering with problem-solving, even acceptance. After all, without our obstacles we are just a baby in a doorway: unformed, mushy and dependent, neither here nor there. The obstacles make us who we are with all our thorniness, bruises, wisdom and beauty. Our memory like the head of Ganesha, burdensome yet ultimately enlightening. Our karma--action-- like his hatchet, cutting through the bondage of desire and expectation. The calloused foot to fill the sock and take us where we're going.

Welcome

user-pic

Welcome to the Laughing Lotus Love Blog: an ongoing discussion of the themes and ideas around which our temple and our asana practice revolve and evolve. In the spirit of Sister Sledge, we are family and our blog is your family dinner: loving, loud, and provocative in the true spirit of the word--pro voice. Your voice, that is. It is our Lotus hope to connect not only teachers and students, as indeed we are all teachers and students, but also teachers and teachers, students and students; feeding our community and family not just with cookies and tea, but the music and light of the mind. We are all on the path; some of us just need to talk about it more often. So meditate and weigh in. Speak out, family. Roll out your mental mat. We yearn to learn about you, from you and with you.

In love and service,
your Lotus

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from October 2009 listed from newest to oldest.

November 2009 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Categories